Recently, Robinhood launched a stock tokenization product, which caused quite a stir in the Web3 community. However, as someone who has been paying attention to blockchain technology for a long time, I want to talk to you about the real situation behind this product. To be honest, this is more like a carefully planned marketing campaign than a real technological innovation.
💼 TL;DR 💼
Robinhood's stock tokenization product is more like a carefully planned marketing campaign. It is mainly intended to seize the high ground of the hot topic of RWA, but from the perspective of actual innovation, there are not many highlights. In short, it uses blockchain as a tool for brand promotion and does not fully utilize the core advantages of blockchain decentralization and composability.
Robinhood’s “synthetic wrapper” model is inferior to Kraken xStocks’ “digital twin” model in terms of legal structure and functionality. It gives users a derivative contract, not real ownership of the underlying assets. And it claims to provide EU clients with exposure to US stocks, but this can be easily done with traditional financial instruments , and there is no need to make it so complicated. In addition, visions that sound great, such as “24x7 trading” and “retail investors investing in private equity”, are difficult to achieve in reality.
Although Robinhood has successfully packaged itself as an industry innovator with this product, its real significance lies in pointing out a possible path for the integration of TradFi and DeFi. And this path may be led by Web2 companies that can simplify the complexity of Web3 and then encapsulate it in a more controllable ecosystem.
🎭 Four ways to tokenize stocks🎭
Before we dive into Robinhood’s product, we need to understand the different ways that stocks can be tokenized. Just like there are many ways to cook a dish, there are also several ways to move traditional stocks to the blockchain.
SYNTHETIC ASSETS
What is it? This is a pure DeFi gameplay. You don't need to hold any real stocks, but by over -collateralizing a bunch of crypto assets (such as ETH) in smart contracts, you can create a token (such as sTSLA) that can track any real asset (including stocks) "out of thin air". The price anchoring of synthetic tokens is dominated by smart contracts: with the help of oracles such as Chainlink, the real-world asset prices are obtained, and the gains and losses of token holders are settled based on this, thereby ensuring that the token value remains linked to the target asset price.
Who do you trust? You trust the code and the economic model. You bet that the smart contract system is robust enough and that the price of over-collateralized collateral is stable and will not collapse.
Representative players: Ostium, Synthetix.
SYNTHETIC WRAPPER
Representative player: Robinhood.
What is it? It is essentially a derivatives game. The tokens purchased by users actually represent a contract signed with Robinhood - Robinhood promises to pay token holders a return equal to the fluctuation of the corresponding stock price. In order to fulfill this redemption promise, Robinhood usually buys real stocks as a hedge, but this is not its legal obligation . In theory, as long as it can obtain regulatory approval , it can also replace stock holdings by purchasing other derivatives such as futures, without the need to purchase stocks at a 1:1 ratio. Robinhood is also not obliged to disclose its specific stock holdings to token holders .
Who do you trust? You trust Robinhood and the regulators behind it 100%.
DIGITAL TWINS
Representative Player: xStocks on Kraken Exchange (issued by Backed Finance).
What is it? This is the most recognized model at present. For each token issued by the issuer, a corresponding share must be deposited in a regulated custodian bank (such as InCore Bank AG in Switzerland). The token in your hand is like a "digital claim certificate" for a stock.
Who to trust? You need to trust the issuer, the custodian bank, and the regulator at the same time, but the good news is that it usually has on-chain tools (such as Chainlink's reserve proof) to allow you to check at any time whether the stocks in the "vault" are really still there.
NATIVE DIGITAL SECURITIES
What is it? This is the most revolutionary. Stocks are no longer the "shadow" of off-chain assets, but are "born" directly on the blockchain. The blockchain itself is the legal record of ownership, completely saying goodbye to paper certificates and centralized systems.
Who do you trust? You trust the blockchain network itself and the legal framework that recognizes it.
Representative players : For example, the European Investment Bank (EIB) issued a €100 million native digital bond directly on Goldman Sachs’ GS DAP™ private blockchain platform under Luxembourg law.
🔍 Analysis of ROBINHOOD and its competitors🔍
ROBINHOOD VS. OSTIUM (Synthetic Wrapper VS. Synthetic Assets)
What they have in common: Both offer users economic exposure to a stock, rather than direct ownership. Essentially, they are derivatives that seek to replicate a stock’s price performance.
Difference: The core difference lies in the foundation of trust .
Robinhood ’s trust comes from institutions and regulation . Users trust that Robinhood, a regulated company, will fulfill its contractual obligations.
Ostium 's trust comes from code and economic games . Users believe that the robustness of the code and excess collateral can ensure the stability of the value of synthetic assets.
ROBINHOOD VS. XSTOCKS (Synthetic Packaging VS. Digital Twin)
Commonality: In theory, the issuers of both models hold real stocks as support.
Differences:
The purpose of holding stocks is different: Robinhood holds stocks to hedge its own risks , which is a risk management method, not a direct legal obligation to users . However, Backed Finance, the issuer of xStocks, has a legal obligation to hold and custody one real stock for each token issued at a 1:1 ratio.
Different ownership and risks: In Robinhood's model, the stocks belong to Robinhood's assets, and users are only its unsecured creditors . If Robinhood goes bankrupt, these stocks will be used to repay all creditors, and users have no priority . In the xStocks model, the stocks are stored in a segregated escrow account set up for the benefit of users, which can theoretically be isolated from the issuer's bankruptcy risk, and users' asset ownership is more secure.
Different on-chain utility: Robinhood’s tokens are confined to its “walled garden ” and cannot interact with external DeFi protocols. xStocks is open, and users can withdraw it to their own wallets for DeFi lending, trading, etc., which is truly composable
🤔 Soul-searching question to ROBINHOOD: What is the use of your "blockchain"? 🤔
Question 1: You can make this product without blockchain, right?
The answer is: Absolutely. The function provided by Robinhood, which allows European users to enjoy the benefits of rising US stocks without holding US stocks, can be achieved with contracts for difference (CFDs) or other derivatives , which have existed in the traditional financial world for decades. Robinhood can use an ordinary centralized database to record who bought how much, without using the Arbitrum blockchain at all.
So why do we still use it? The answer is simple: marketing . Today, when RWA and tokenization are popular all over the world, putting "blockchain" and "token" on products can immediately attract attention, create news, increase the company's stock price, and package itself as an innovator at the forefront of the times.
Question 2: How did DEFI, which was supposed to be a “Lego”, become a “walled garden”?
The reality is: Robinhood's stock tokens are inseparable from its app. Although it is issued on the public blockchain Arbitrum, its smart contract contains a "gateway code" that only allows transfers between wallets approved by Robinhood. This means that you cannot withdraw it to your own wallet, trade it on DEX, or use it as collateral for lending - all the composability of Web3 has nothing to do with you.
Why do this? This is for control and compliance . Once open, Robinhood will not be able to manage regulatory requirements such as KYC/AML. Therefore, it would rather sacrifice the core open spirit of blockchain and build an absolutely secure "walled garden".
Question three: We agreed to “trust”, but why did it end up being “trust me, brother”?
The reality is: you have to trust Robinhood 100%. The only thing the blockchain can prove to you is that "you did buy a contract from Robinhood." But it can't prove whether Robinhood really bought stocks to hedge risks, nor can it prove whether it has the ability to honor the contract if Robinhood goes bankrupt.
The paradox of trust: This creates a huge paradox. Blockchain was created to eliminate trust in centralized institutions, but Robinhood's model requires you to place all your trust in one company. In this case, how much sense does it make to use blockchain to prove the trivial matter of "you bought"?
Summary: From these three points of view, Robinhood’s stock token is indeed “ blockchain in name only, not in substance ”. It is more like a Web2.5 product disguised as Web3, a gorgeous “blockchain show”.
🌟 Those overhyped "revolutionary" features🌟
Beyond Robinhood itself, it’s also worth a reality check on some of the current overhyped RWA concepts.
Misconception 1: Stocks on the blockchain = 24X7 trading?
It sounds good, but the reality is very harsh. Why does Robinhood only promise " 24x5 " instead of " 24x7 "? Because the weekend is a "risk black hole" in the global financial market.
Market makers’ dilemma: Any trading market needs market makers to provide liquidity. In order to hedge risks, market makers need to buy stocks in the real stock market when you buy tokens. But on weekends, the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq are all closed. Where can market makers hedge? If they can’t hedge, they can only bear all the risks themselves. If something big happens over the weekend, the stock price plummets when it opens on Monday, and the market maker goes bankrupt.
The truth about 24x5: Even on Monday to Friday nights, because the real stock market is closed, market makers can only hedge imperfectly through instruments such as stock index futures. To compensate for the risk, they will significantly increase the bid-ask spread. Therefore, the cost of after-hours trading will be very high, the liquidity is also poor, and it is only suitable for users with urgent needs. It is more like an expensive "emergency exit" than a smooth highway.
Myth 2: Can retail investors also invest in OPENAI? A “mirage” of private equity
Controversy : Robinhood once launched an activity to give away OpenAI and SpaceX tokens, which immediately attracted attention. OpenAI immediately clarified that it had not authorized any related token issuance, and the market was in an uproar. The two questions I am concerned about are: First, why are the stocks of such popular companies given away? Second, since Robinhood claims that the tokens are backed by real stocks, where do the stocks of unlisted private companies such as OpenAI and SpaceX come from?
Where do stocks come from? The answer lies in the "private equity secondary market" that is difficult for ordinary people to access. Transactions here are not transparent, prices are not public, and liquidity is extremely poor. Robinhood probably managed to buy a small number of shares through a complex "special purpose vehicle" (SPV) structure. However, these shares are too small and lack liquidity even if the company goes public in the future, so they are simply given away as a marketing gimmick.
Opportunity or risk? Private equity investment has always had a very high threshold and is only open to "qualified investors". The core reason is that it is extremely risky and has highly asymmetric information. Institutions that are capable of participating in this type of investment can complete transactions without relying on stock codes; ordinary people are restricted from access because they neither need nor can bear this risk. Tokenizing such assets seems to be "popularizing opportunities", but in fact it is pushing risks that should not be borne by ordinary people to the public - in essence, it is more like "popularizing risks".
💭 Marketing Victory and the Real Future💭
Having said all that, is Robinhood's move completely useless? No, quite the opposite. From another perspective, this could be a genius first step .
A victory in the narrative war: Although the product itself is technically mediocre, Robinhood has completely defeated its lesser-known competitors with more hardcore technology in terms of brand recognition and market voice. It has successfully tied itself to the grand narrative of "the future of finance", which is crucial for a public company.
Paving the way for the future: Robinhood's ambitions are far more than that. They have announced that they will build their own Layer 2 blockchain in the future and support users' "self-custody" assets. This is the key! This means that today's "walled garden" is just a transitional stage, a test field for accumulating users, testing technology, and dealing with regulation. When the door to the garden is really opened, all the limitations we discussed today may be subverted.
The endurance of Web2 giants: Finally, this incident also tells us that the large-scale adoption of Web3 may be inseparable from traditional Internet brokers like Robinhood. Because pure DeFi is still too complicated for ordinary people. And what Robinhood is best at is making complex things simple, imperceptible, and easy to use. They are like translators, telling the story of Web3 in a language that the public can understand.
So, our final conclusion is:
At the current stage, Robinhood's stock token is indeed more symbolic than practical, and is a successful marketing hype.
But it is also like a wedge, knocking on the door to the integration of traditional finance and blockchain. It has taken the first step in the most pleasing and pragmatic way. A true revolution will not happen overnight, and what we are witnessing is the prelude to this great change.
For us ordinary investors, perhaps the most important thing is to stay sober, understand the ins and outs, not be dazzled by gorgeous narratives, and not scoff at future possibilities.
This article is based on public information analysis and does not constitute investment advice. Cryptocurrency investment is risky, please make decisions carefully, DYOR.
If you like this article, please follow, like and forward it to show your support!
It should be noted that this article is just a "simplified popular science version" of a professional research report. If you want to know more in-depth content, please follow the blogger and send a private message to request the full research report. The full version of the research report is richer and more detailed, including more analysis, charts, data and references .
