The “simple” philosophy in investing

The Hong Kong government is serious about attracting investment

Will everything be fine if we go out to sea?

With the arrival of the final chapter of this series, we have systematically sorted out the high-frequency crimes that practitioners in the field of virtual currency may be involved in, such as pyramid schemes, illegal operations, and money laundering. As the final work of the series, this article will focus on the crime of illegal use of information networks (hereinafter referred to as "non-trust crimes"), which is easily overlooked but extremely "lethal" in practice. Although it is a minor crime, it is often the first choice for prosecution and may even become a "breaking ice weapon" to break through the criminal case.

Free protocols are not free

The routine of the "coin factory" is more dazzling than the fake moves on the court

A good Web3 project cannot do without a large user base. For this reason, many project owners adopt the method of attracting new users and returning commissions to quickly attract users. But is there any legal risk? If involved, may it be subject to administrative or criminal penalties? In this article, Attorney Mankiw deeply analyzes the classic case included in the People's Court Case Library: EOS Ecological Platform Case, and deeply analyzes the compliance boundary of Web3 projects touching pyramid scheme crimes.

New progress of Ensemble Sandbox in Hong Kong

Recently, the Jiangsu Provincial High Court published a typical foreign-related case in which a Singaporean investor cooperated with a Chinese citizen to invest in cryptocurrency. The court ruled that "the contract was invalid and the risk was borne by the investor". The Singaporean investor lost millions of yuan in principal. Let's take a look at what happened in this case.

To separate or to integrate, that is the question.

"You are staring into the abyss, and the abyss is also staring into you."

Is Hong Kong's investment immigration ushering in the era of crypto assets?