Brookings Institution researchers warn that the Clarity Act could result in "regulation in name only, without real regulation."

PANews reported on May 29th, citing CoinDesk, that Brookings Institution researcher Aaron Klein stated on The Policy Protocol that if the Clarity Act expands the powers of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to regulate crypto assets, but lacks the necessary personnel, budget, and expertise, it could result in "apparent regulation, but in reality, a lack of substantive oversight." Klein pointed out that the CFTC was originally designed for the futures market and is ill-equipped to handle the proposed scale of crypto regulation, noting that the agency's regulatory capacity has weakened in recent years due to staff turnover and restructuring. He recalled the experience of the Dodd-Frank era, stating that fragmented regulation and multiple regulatory bodies can lead to delays and vacuums, and he worries about a repeat of this in the crypto and prediction markets. He also criticized political interference in financial regulation, advocating for stronger collaboration between the CFTC and SEC, and suggesting a long-term merger of the two agencies.

Share to:

Author: PA一线

This content is for market information only and is not investment advice.

Follow PANews official accounts, navigate bull and bear markets together
PANews APP
SEC Chairman Atkins reiterated the "Crypto Capital of America" ​​strategy, which will drive reforms in on-chain capital markets.
PANews Newsflash