BitJungle will share some information about the DEXX case from the perspective of its own case-solving , reveal the possible true culprit of the DEXX case, and do its best to recover losses for the victims as soon as possible.
Here are a few points that victims and all parties need to pay attention to:
1. The truth and characterization of the case (was it an insider, absconding, theft, or fraud)
Get trusted channels:
The relevant judicial authorities shall publish a police notice on the case.
DEXX official announcement after the police clarified the nature of the case.
2. Whether the suspect is arrested, detained and convicted, and the case reaches the stage of being sent to the procuratorate and the court, the court's judgment is the final characterization and outcome of the case.
3. The victims recover their losses and the suspects return the stolen money. This is the core goal that everyone is working towards .
Friendly Tips :
This case is a criminal case . The judicial authorities will not charge any fees in the process of recovering losses when handling such cases. Everyone must protect their private keys and evidence of stolen APP forensics to provide evidence support for their own loss recovery.
BitJungle has made some explanations based on the three possible situations for your reference. You are also welcome to follow BitJungle’s Twitter account to participate in voting and discussions on the case.
Profile of the perpetrator: External hacker
BitJungle provides two possible portraits of the external hackers who committed the DEXX case:
· Hacker Profile 1 : Professional top hacker with financial counter-trading and monetization capabilities (high probability, over 70% )
Reason: Hackers do not need to liquidate their assets. They only need to take advantage of the sharp drop in Meme coins in a short period of time to realize off-market cross-trading and make profits, thus completing the closed loop of theft and profit.
Probability of solving the case and recovering losses: BitJungle’s case solving rate for such cases is about 35% .
· Hacker Profile 2 : Weak Junior Hacker (Low Probability)
Reason: Because he did not collect, disperse and liquidate his assets. According to BitJungle’s judgment on hackers, the number of hackers in this situation does not exceed 30% .
Probability of solving the case and recovering losses: BitJungle’s case solving rate for such cases is over 65%.
Profile of the perpetrator 2: Insider crime
Internal technical personnel participated in the crime, exploited project loopholes, carried out targeted attacks, and stole project funds.
· Probability of solving the case and recovering losses: BitJungle has a case solving rate of over 90% for such cases
Portrait of the perpetrator 3: New Web3 open Pixiu scam
Compared with the traditional Pixiu scam lock-up model, the new Web3 open Pixiu scam is more covert and clever in its approach . The issuer usually claims that the project was hacked and the funds were stolen and transferred. However, the stolen funds did not flow further or be converted into cash, but stayed at a certain address for a long time, which is exactly the same as the traditional lock-up effect .
As the incident fermented and time passed, market confidence gradually collapsed, and the value of project funds or tokens fell sharply. At the same time, the platform used various means to " wash the ground " and tried to cover up its own suspicion, claiming that it was doing its best to save the situation, and even issued a statement that it would recover the funds. In the later stage, they usually falsely claimed to have found the hacker and returned part of the assets of the victimized users. However, at this time, the platform had already successfully obtained huge profits through high fees, token pre-sales or other secret operations, and finally " retired " .
The following is a flowchart of two types of Pixiu scams summarized by BitJungle
