BIP-110 aims to restrict the storage of non-monetary data in Bitcoin blocks through a soft fork, primarily targeting the embedding of images and videos on-chain in the inscription protocol. Supporters argue that this "data abuse" increases the burden on nodes and undermines decentralization, advocating for the restoration of Bitcoin's "pure currency" status. Opponents emphasize Bitcoin's immutability, worrying that a low activation threshold of 55% of computing power will disrupt consensus rules, trigger chain splits, and even set a precedent for future interventions such as asset freezes. Miners, concerned about transaction fee revenue, also generally oppose the proposal. The proposal has also sparked widespread discussion regarding the fairness of the SegWit discount mechanism, the risk of "dead money" in UTXOs, and legal implications. Essentially, this controversy is a debate about whether Bitcoin should maintain its "digital gold" purity or allow for more open application exploration. 
